Adult
Stores May Have To Stop Selling And Displaying Some of Their
Better Sex Videos, Books, Adult Films, Pictures & Adult
Products?
The
Government Is Controlling What You Watch & Purchase-
The revised Title 18 U.S.C. § 2257 Law
The
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has been threatening
to make it almost impossible to sell better sex and adult
videos or pictures for some time now, but they finally
have implemented a law which takes effect June 23rd, 2005
to attempt to do just that. This article will explain
to you the consumer, what that means to you. |
|
There
is a law that was created in 1988 to protect minors from appearing
in adult films, etc... a good law if you ask me as I am very
much against minors being involved in anything of the like.
The law was in a document called Title 18 U.S.C. § 2257, which
is a Federal Record-keeping and Labeling law that required
anyone who photographed or filmed a person in the US to have
them complete a form that acknowledged that they were 18 years
of age or older. They had to provide a picture I.D. issued
by the state. and provide any aliases they may have. They
needed to provide their legal name, home address and have
a witness sign the document. This was a good law that helped
to reduce the chance that a minor was being filmed or photographed
sexually.
The
New Law
What
the Department of Justice has now done to change this law
using the "excuse" of protecting minors (when in
reality it is clear they are trying to impair the adult industry)
is an outrage and WILL affect you if you have any liking of
sexuality and sexual products, videos, pictures, etc.
The
DOJ is now demanding that not only will a producer have the
Title 18 U.S.C. § 2257 information for each model that has
been photographed or filmed but that anyone who sells or displays
the photographs or video has to have that document on file
which includes the distributors, retailers and anyone who
shows pictures of that model on their web site.
What
Types Of Pictures Or Video Is This Talking About?
This
pertains to any visual depiction of an actual human being
engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct in a book, picture,
video, streaming video, thumbnail... you name it.
What
do they mean when the say "sexually explicit?" This
means (sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital,
anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the
same or opposite sex; bestiality; masturbation; sadistic or
masochistic abuse; or lascivious exhibition of the genitals
or pubic area of any person).
The
DOJ calls these businesses and individuals who sell or promote
such material "Secondary Producers" even though
they did not produce anything and are only displaying and/or
selling what the "Primary Producer" made!
Under
the revised Title 18 U.S.C. § 2257 law, the so-called “secondary
producers,” such as many webmasters, will be required to have
Title 18 U.S.C. § 2257 records for all sexually explicit depiction
dating back to 1995. For many, this will create a huge problem,
because secondary producers will have to locate records from
primary producers who may have moved, shut down, or otherwise
disappeared.
This
means that the adult community has exactly one month to secure
these files and make sure everything in them complies with
the new regulations, because the arrests could hit anytime
after June 24, and the general consensus is that it'll hit
webmasters first and hardest.
What
Are The Penalties For Not Complying?
In
the immediate future, you're going to be seeing inspections
and arrests, not because of 'illegal' content, but because
webmasters and stores don't have the records because they
always thought that it was and should be the producer's job
to make sure that the models are over 18 years of age. Violation
of 18 U.S.C. 2257 is good for up to 10 years in federal prison...
per violation!
Example
Below
is a very small scale of what this will look like. Imagine
that it is for one video with six models in it. All six of
the model's personal information, home address, real name,
and picture of their ID has to be on file with every single
store or individual who sells that video. Now, imagine that
each website who carries and displays (perhaps even streams
the videos) of hundreds of videos has the burden to have all
of those files for each model in every video they carry!
This
isn't just for retailers either... this is for anyone displaying
such pictures on their web site, etc.! So what happens if
you don't comply? Well, you can go to jail! Yep, that is right...
even if a producer has proof that the models were over 18
years of age and no minors were involved... if you do not
have the paperwork and you display the photographs or video
or sell them... you are now breaking the law.
What
harm has been committed here is beyond me. Why we now have
to go to the trouble of proving that all the videos that we
carry are of models of 18 years of age or older by having
those model's Title 18 U.S.C. § 2257 forms on file is truly
a conservative agenda to make the adult industry fight to
stay alive.
The
Real Motivation Is Not Protecting Kids
This
is clearly not about protecting minors. If the Department
of Justice really wanted to protect minors they would simply
have producers of pictures and video, etc. provide documentation
directly to them in a federal database proving the models
in film or photographs are adults. Simple enough right?
It would work well this way, because everything would have
to be registered with them and if it wasn't then they could
easily check. However, the REAL MOTIVATION is to shut down
adult retailers and you can bet they have a list of companies
they are going to start with... and you can also bet that
getting access to any kind of sexual content will be increasingly
difficult as the the DOJ continues to take away the freedoms
of Americans.
This
is an attack, we are back to the dark ages of witch hunts
and instead of burning innocent people at the stake they are
putting them in jail and ripping apart their businesses and
families.
Why
is sexuality so terrifying in this day and age? Why is masturbation
and nudity seen as something that is listed right beside beastiliaty
and child molestation? Have people absolutely lost their minds?
They are so different than one another. It is like comparing
someone who has a normal sleep pattern to someone who has
narcolepsy. One is normal, one is an illness!
Over fifty percent of the web sites out there will most likely
be devastated because they're carrying content, either thumbnails
or streaming or fixed photos that they have no records for
and they will be at risk to get 10 years in the slammer for
it.
Breach
Of Confidentiality
This
does not even mention the incredible breach of confidentiality
that is going on here. The models have to provide their home
address, real names and photos of their ID cards to all of
these retailers, which in turn basically makes it public information!?!
That is absurd. Do you know how many psychos want to track
down models in the adult industry and now we are having to
pass around their real names and home address!?!
Making
It Very Hard To Sell Videos Or Show Pictures
This
new law is requiring stores like ours to have to track down
producers and ask them for the paperwork on all of their models
in order to display and sell their video. Until we have that
paperwork on file, we cannot show the images online or sell
them without breaking the law. It is evident that the US is
becoming less and less of a free democracy making it more
and more difficult for adults to enjoy and be educated on
the basic human right of sexuality.
This
Is Not Just For Retailers
The
law does not state that you have to be selling the products
to have to comply with the law. So that means that even if
you just have such pictures on a web site or are giving it
away items with such images away for free... you have to have
the 2257 model releases.
The
DOJ can even come after individual personal web sites and
make sure that you have the proper paperwork and release forms
for you and your girlfriend's nude pictures on the web! If
not... you could get 10 years in the slammer under this new
law!
The
Free Speech Coalition Is Fighting This!
Now
that the regulations have been published, FSC (Free Speech
Coalition) will go into federal district court to seek an
injunction on behalf of its members. FSC plans two lawsuits,
led by premiere First Amendment attorneys, one to be filed
on the West Coast by H. Louis Sirkin, and the other by Paul
Cambria on the East Coast.
The
DOJ has amended some requirements from its original proposal,
but in many areas the final version is unbending, making compliance
extremely difficult, if not impossible.
Will
They Win?
Right
now, it looks to be a long arduous task. The FSC may make
a dent in some minor changes, but overall this ridiculous
law looks like it may stay around to stomp on the sexual freedoms
of all Americans. Only time will tell.
What
Can You Do?
Join
the Free
Speech Coalition and find out more about what is going
on and what you can do through their web site! In the meantime,
stay tuned to our site for updates and know that we intend
to stand up for your sexual health and education rights.
Join
NASAE.org
to band together and stay informed!